Infidelity or Adultery in a Texas Divorce
In Texas, adultery or infidelity may play a significant role in how a divorce unfolds, impacting asset division in a divorce and even custody issues to a certain extent. Here’s how adultery generally affects the divorce process in Texas:
1. Grounds for Divorce:
- No-Fault Divorce: Texas allows for “no-fault” divorces, where neither spouse has to blame the other for the breakdown of the marriage. Commonly, the reason cited is “insupportability,” which means that the marriage has become insupportable due to discord or conflict of personalities that destroys the legitimate ends of the marital relationship and prevents any reasonable expectation of reconciliation.
- Fault-Based Divorce: Adultery is also one of the grounds for a fault-based divorce in Texas. If one spouse can prove the other’s infidelity, it can influence the divorce proceedings, particularly in financial settlements and custody decisions. The Court of Appeals has given the following definition of Adultery: “the voluntary sexual intercourse of a married person with one not the spouse.” In re S.A.A., 279 S.W.3d 853, 856 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2009, no pet.)
2. Impact on Division of Assets:
- In Texas, the court divides marital property based on what is “just and right.” While this typically starts with the presumption of a 50/50 split, proven adultery can lead the court to award a more favorable division to the non-adulterous spouse. This is because the court may consider the circumstances and factors under which the property was acquired and the behavior of the parties during the marriage. Such factors include: Such factors include (1) the nature of the marital property, (2) the relative earning capacity and business opportunities of the parties, (3) the parties’ relative financial condition and obligations, (4) the parties’ education, (5) the size of separate estates, (6) the age, (7) health, and (8) physical conditions of the parties, (9) fault in breaking up the marriage, (10) the benefit the innocent spouse would have received had the marriage continued, and (11) the probable need for future support. Murff v. Murff, 615 S.W.2d 696, 698 (Tex. 1981).
3. Impact on Child Custody and Visitation:
- While adultery by itself does not necessarily impact custody arrangements, the circumstances surrounding the adultery might. For instance, if adulterous behavior also involved other conduct that could be deemed harmful to the children it could influence the court’s decisions regarding custody and visitation rights. More common repercussions for Adultery or Infidelity in a divorce are what the Court’s call a “morality clause”. This provision usually prohibits one parent from having a romantic third-party guest stay in the house while the children are present from 8:00 pm to 9:00 am the next day.
4. Proving Adultery:
- Proving adultery in a divorce case requires evidence that convinces the court of the likelihood that infidelity occurred. Direct evidence is not necessarily required; circumstantial evidence that suggests the likelihood of both opportunity and inclination to commit adultery might suffice. The burden of proof is the preponderance of the evidence, thus just a little more than 50%. It should be known that actions of adultery and infidelity are still probably even after separation and during the divorce litigation.
Adultery and Infidelity are not as damaging in the modern era, though it is completely fact intensive and dependent on the Judge in your case. Some Judges take Adultery in a Texas Divorce more seriously than others. It is a liability to mitigate if it has occurred.
Julian Nacol
Nacol Law Firm P.C.
Dallas Divorce Attorney
(972) 690-3333
Litigation in Texas
The first step to begin a lawsuit in Texas is to finding a lawyer who is knowledgeable and experienced in the area of your legal concern.
In Texas, the filing of an original petition or a complaint officially starts a lawsuit. The complaint will state the facts of the case, spell out the legal issues as they relate to the facts and request the Court grant relief. The complaint is then filed with the court and served on the Defendant who will have a set period of time to respond.
After the complaint has been filed and the Defendant has entered his answer, the discovery phase of the lawsuit begins. During the discovery process, the counsel for each side will gather as much evidence as is reasonable to present their case to the judge or jury. Such discovery includes but is not limited to depositions (sworn testimony taken out of court); disclosure of witnesses, experts and other necessary information; interrogatories (written questions); requests for production of documents; requests for admissions; requests for business records, and electronically stored information (ESI), etc. Discovery may last from a few months to a year, and in some cases several years. Discovery rules can be very liberal, allowing a great deal of evidence to be revealed.
In Texas most courts require the parties to mediate a case before allowing it to go to trial. Mediation can be a useful process as it allows both sides to state their case to a neutral party who has experience in the issues being mediated and who will attempt to assist in the resolution of the case before the parties are forced to incur the expense of a trial. In many cases, the mediation process is a good gauge for a possible trial outcome. At a minimum, it allows each side to measure the strengths and weaknesses of the case.
The pre-trial conference takes place approximately one week prior to the case going to trial and presents yet another opportunity for counsel to settle the case or review the issues. During the pre-trial conference the counsel speak informally with the judge and agree to the undisputed issues. They share the evidence they intend to present during trial and the witnesses they plan to call to testify. The parties, along with the judge, are then able to plan the course of the trial.
After completion of the discovery, mediation and the pre-trial conference, should the parties be unable to settle the case, it will then be placed on the Court’s trial docket and proceeds to trial.
The trial most commonly proceeds in the following manner: Plaintiff’s attorney makes an opening statement detailing the facts of the case followed by the Defendant’s attorney detailing the defenses; Plaintiff’s witnesses and evidence are introduced, examined and cross-examined; Defendant’s witnesses and evidence are introduced, examined and cross-examined; Plaintiff and Defendant are allowed to introduce rebuttal evidence; and, finally, Plaintiff presents their closing argument, followed by the Defendant’s closing argument.
When a jury is hearing the case, a judge will instruct the jury as to the law that is to be applied to the issues. The jury will then retire to the jury room until a verdict is reached. Should the jury end in a deadlock, the judge will normally send the jury back to deliberate until a verdict is reached. If a verdict cannot be reached, the judge must declare a mistrial. If a verdict is returned, the judge will generally enter a judgment on the verdict.
Verbal Contracts and Texas Law
Verbal Contracts do exist and are legally enforceable in Texas, as a matter of law, if they meet necessary legal requirements and specificity. Adequate consideration must be given between the two parties of a verbal contract to make it binding. Adequate consideration is defined in two ways: (1) having a mutual reciprocal exchange [bargained for exchange] or (2) having legal value [an individual must do something that he is not legally obligated to do]. If adequate consideration is given between both parties and all other legal requirements are met, then a verbal contract may be held valid in a court of law.
Verbal contracts are also limited by the Statute of Frauds. The Statute of Frauds requires certain types of contracts to only be in writing purportedly to avoid defrauding citizens.
The following must be in writing:
This Nacol Law Firm Blog in listed in the Top Ten Blog Posts on Texas Bar Today!
(1) Making a will or Trust
(2) A contract to answer for the duty of another (Guarantee/Suretyship)
(3) Marriage (exception common law marriage)
(4) Sale and contracts affecting Land
(5) A contract that lasts longer than 1 year from the time it is made and which cannot be performed in one year
(6) Any sale of goods for a price of $500 or more
(7) Sales of securities
Verbal contracts in Texas have limitations. Let’s say that a contractor wanted to paint the outside of your house. You decide to pay the contractor seven thousand to paint the outside of the house and the job will take approximately 3-8 weeks. If you have a verbal contract with the painter and pay him this could be legally enforceable in a court of law. The verbal contract with the painter is not invalidated by any provision set above in the Statute of fraud. It is a contract for service, under one year, and adequate consideration has been given with the payment of seven thousand dollars.
Here is another example of a verbal contract that will not be upheld in a court of law. An individual buys fifty acres from his neighbor for fifty thousand dollars under a verbal contract. Before the fifty thousand dollars is exchanged, the neighbor decides to pull out of the deal. This verbal contract would not be enforceable in court and the buyer cannot enforce the contract because it deals with real estate (land). This is one of the specific types of contracts that must be in writing because of the Statute of Frauds. The individual may get his money back but the point is he cannot enforce the contract since it is not in writing.
The best course of action in the litigious world we live in is to cover your tracks by securing a written contract in almost all circumstances. Do not rely on the limited options that allow a verbal contract to be enforced because in court you will have to deal with the “He said, she said” testimony and incur significant cost of litigation unnecessarily.
Consolidation of Cases
Suppose, for example, that you have decided to bring a suit against your employer for workplace harassment that occurred in the Fall of 2022. Suppose also that one of your co-employees also brings a suit against that employer for workplace harassment due to the same or similar actions on the part of the employer that also occurred in the Fall of 2022. Pursuant to Tex. R. Civ. P. 174(a):
When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may order a joint hearing or trial of any or all the matters in issue in the actions; it may order all the actions consolidated; and it may make such orders concerning proceedings therein as may tend to avoid unnecessary costs or delay.
Consolidation is appropriate if one trial or hearing would serve the same purpose as two, provided no party is prejudiced. A court will consolidate two cases if the result is fewer trials, reduction of time consuming examination of evidence, and reduction of costs. Essentially, a court will consolidate to promote judicial efficiency. [H. Rouw Co. v. Tex. & N.O.R. Co., 260 S.W.2d 69, 69–70 (Tex. Civ. App.—San Antonio 1953, no writ); see Frumer, Multiple Parties and Claims in Texas, 6 Sw. L.J. 135, 138 (1952)].
If several independent actions that could have been joined as one action originally (see Tex. R. Civ. P. 40(a), 51) are pending in the same court, a court may order the actions consolidated into one action. Tex. R. Civ. P. 174(a). A court also has the discretion to transfer a case to another court in order for those cases to be consolidated.
Considering the above scenario where you and one of your co-workers brought nearly identical separate actions against your employer, the chief consideration of a court in deciding whether the two cases should be consolidated is whether the two cases derive from a “common question of law or fact.” In this simplified scenario, it is highly likely that a court would consolidate the two cases because they have same questions of law (i.e., the same causes of action and legal theories) and of fact (i.e., the same factual scenario of being discriminated against within the same time period). While there could be an argument made that your suit contains different facts and scenarios because you are a completely different party from that of your co-worker, such an argument may be futile because courts have an abundance of discretion on this issue and are chiefly concerned with judicial economy. A court would likely see two harassment cases arising out of similar actions of the employer that occurred around the same time period and conclude that the cases likely have a common question of law or fact, almost certainly could have been joined as one action originally, and would be more efficiently tried as one case.
As you can imagine, more complex, nuanced questions of consolidation can arise. Say, for example, you are sued for breach of contract by an individual and separately for fraud by an LLC owned by that same individual. Suppose, while those claims are different, they are still related to the same set of factual circumstances. May a court still consolidate these cases together? Perhaps. The court has broad discretion when determining whether to consolidate. At the end of the day, “the underlying test remains whether the two actions have a logical connection in the sense that it would be more convenient and efficient for the two actions to be tried together.” 7 Dorsaneo, Texas Litigation Guide § 112.02 (2024).
Nacol Law Firm P.C.
Dallas Civil Litigation Lawyers
Call (972) 690-3333
Disclaimer: The information provided in this article is in no way intended to constitute legal advice. The information provided is merely an overview of the relevant law. Do not act on this information. Always consult an attorney for legal advice.
Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act : Pre-Purchase Protection When Buying a Home in Texas
Purchasing a home can be a daunting yet exhilarating experience depending on the circumstances. Sometimes after a couple has purchased a home they regretfully discover many construction defects that were not disclosed to them by the Seller. Many undisclosed material defects within a home not detected by the buyer’s independent inspector that were misrepresented by the Seller may cause severe hardships in the future.
Legal relief requires an experienced real estate lawyer. A fraudulent misrepresentation made by a Seller when selling a home may give rise to a claim under the Deceptive Trade Practices Act of Texas. Multiple provisions relating to the misrepresentation of property per Tex. Bus. & Comm. Code §§ 17.46(b) are designed to protect a buyer. These misrepresentations if properly proven by the evidence will give rise to certain damages available to Buyers under the Texas DTPA Statute.
If you are the victim of fraudulent misrepresentations your independent inspector did not discover during the house inspection, you may still have relief. If circumstances prove that a misrepresentation was intently made or defect was concealed by the Seller, then under the DTPA you may be eligible to receive Economic Damages. Economic Damages include compensation for any pecuniary loss, including repair or replacement of defect. If the buyer of the home is victorious at trial, attorney’s fees and additional damages may be awarded as well.
If it can be proven that a Seller “knowingly” misrepresented a portion of the home to a buyer such as hiding evidence of termites, hiding foundation defect or old repairs, or electrical problems, then the buyer may be entitled to 3 times the amount of actual economic damages of the suit including attorney’s fees. The DTPA is a consumer based protection statute that ensures normal people are not taken advantage of due to their lack of knowledge.
If you are a buyer that has intentionally been taken advantage of by a Seller through fraud or deceit you should find an experienced attorney. DTPA actions are complex and time sensitive. An experienced attorney will give you the highest probability of success.
The Texas housing market is exploding and there are many out of state individuals moving into the Dallas / Fort Worth area. If you are a native Texan or a family transferring into the Dallas / Fort Worth area and feel you have been fraudulently deceived by a Seller, please call an experienced attorney with a firm hand to obtain the justice you deserve under the DTPA and other Consumer Protection Laws.
Julian Nacol, Attorney
Nacol Law Firm P.C.
NACOL LAW FIRM P.C.
8144 Walnut Hill Lane
Suite 1190
Dallas, Texas 75231
972-690-3333
Office Hours
Monday – Thursday, 8am – 5pm
Friday, 8:30am – 5pm
OUR BLOGS
SEARCH
JOIN OUR NETWORK
Attorney Mark A. Nacol is board certified in Civil Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization
