Blog2024-06-16T18:17:23+00:00

Mark Nacol – The Nacol Law Firm PC – Dallas Texas Civil Litigation Attorney

As  a civil trial lawyer, Dallas Texas civil litigation attorney, Mark Nacol,  offers legal advice and representation in a broad scope of practice areas, with an emphasis on the following:

We encourage you to call us to learn how The Nacol Law Firm PC  can best serve your interests.

The Nacol Law Firm PC
8144 Walnut Hill Lane
Suite 1190
Dallas, TX 75231
Metro: 972-690-3333
Toll Free: 866-352-5240
Fax: 972-690-9901
www.NacolLawFirm.com

Improper Home Foreclosure – Know Your Rights

Knowledge of the rules, regulations and laws governing Texas home foreclosures can help homeowners protect their interests from an improper or irregular foreclosure.  Foreclosures may be judicial (ordered by a court following a judgment in a lawsuit) or non-judicial (done without court involvement by auction “on the courthouse steps”).  Most foreclosures are non-judicial.

 

Among other things, a proper foreclosure’s involve three core conditions:

 

1.             real estate lien note executed by the mortgagor (borrower) at closing for the balance of the purchase price;

2.             deed of trust signed by the buyer at closing giving the mortgagee (lender or its successor(s)) a security interest in the property being purchased; and

3.             pertinent Texas statutory and case law. 

 

Generally, a foreclosure is proper if it complies with the procedure outlined in the deed of trust.  Texas law is relevant only where the deed of trust is silent on a mandatory statutory issue or where the deed of trust conflicts with Texas law.

 

To initiate a foreclosure the borrower must, among other things, default on a periodic payment required by the real estate lien note as described in the note and deed of trust.  The lender then has the option of accelerating the collection of the remaining balance of the note.  The entire amount of remaining indebtedness, not just the periodic payment in arrears, may then become immediately due and payable in full.  This is known as the acceleration clause.

 

If the collateral securing the note is the debtor’s residence, the lender may not accelerate the not immediately following default.  Instead, the lender must give the debtor at least a 20-day written notice (unless the deed of trust is on the FNMA form, then 30 days notice of default must be given) to cure the payments in arrears thereby reinstating the Note.  The notice must be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested.  This notice cannot be waived and is required in all instances.

 

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act requires that a borrower be given 30 days to request and obtain verification of the debt.  The lender may give notice of default, accelerate the debt, and even post the property for foreclosure in less time, but the foreclosure sale itself should not be conducted until the 30-day debt verification period has expired and only then with proper statutory notice to the Debtor.  There is also an equivalent state statute (the “Texas Debt Collection Practices Act”) contained in Texas Finance Code Chapter 392.  Failure to provide verification of the debt when the borrower has requested it in writing has serious penalties under both laws.

 

If the debtor does not make the payments in default during the 20 or 30-day period, the lender may accelerate the debt by sending notice of the acceleration to the debtor.

 

If the collateral serves as the debtor’s residence, the lender must give the following notice via certified mail unless they are waived in the deed of trust:

 

1.             A demand notice for the installment in arrears and thereafter affording the debtor an opportunity to remedy the default;

2.             A clear and unequivocal notice of the lender’s intent to accelerate the debt after the debtor has been given a reasonable time to cure the installment in arrears;

3.             A final notice that acceleration has in fact occurred.

 

It has been held proper to combine the first notice concerning the default with the second one involving the intent to accelerate.

 

The trustee is the central character in the foreclosure process.  The trustee has the sole authority to sell the property and to convey title to a Buyer.  The debtor grants this authority to the trustee in the deed of trust.  Texas statutes restrict, to some degree, persons eligible to serve as trustees or substitute trustees.  Dual functions under the security agreement disqualify an individual to serve as a trustee.  Likewise, the person cannot be a debt collector.

 

Lenders may authorize a mortgage servicer to appoint a substitute trustee or trustees to serve under the deed of trust.  The name and street address of the substitute trustee or trustees must be disclosed on the appointments and in the notices timely posted and filed at the courthouse and sent to the debtor.

 

Conditions stated in the deed of trust for the appointment of a substitute trustee must be strictly followed.  Unless the deed of trust provides otherwise, a trustee or trustees need not formally resign before another is appointed.  If the original trustee has posted, filed and sent the required notices, the substitute trustee or trustees should postpone the sale. 

 

The sale may occur only on the first Tuesday of each month occurring 21 days after the new notices have been properly posted, filed and sent.  Generally, the sale is conducted at the courthouse steps.

 

The trustee is the only one who can conduct a valid sale.  However agents of the trustee may sign, post, file and send the notices. 

 

After notice has been posted, filed and sent and the required 21-day period has elapsed, the trustee may proceed with the sale on the first Tuesday of the following month anytime between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., but within three hours after the time designated in the notices. 

 

A mortgage servicer has the same authority as a lender as long as these conditions are met:

 

1.             the lender grants the current mortgage servicer the administrative authority to act on its behalf in the servicing agreement;

2.             all notices, filings and postings preceding the foreclosure sale show that the mortgage servicer represents the mortgagee under the service agreement between the two; and

3.             the notices, postings and filings preceding the foreclosure contain the name and address of the mortgagee or the name and address of the mortgage servicer if the lender has granted the mortgage servicer the authority to service the mortgage.

 

As of May 20, 2009 a new federal statute impacts the possession date of rental property purchased at foreclosure.  If the foreclosure involves a federally related mortgage on a dwelling or residential property, the purchaser must give any bona fide tenant in possession at least 90 days notice to vacate.  The term bona fide tenant is defined as one who acquired the lease at an arms-length transaction where the rent is not substantially less than the fair market value for the area. 

 

Inadequacy of the consideration at a foreclosure sale can be grounds to have the sale set aside under federal bankruptcy laws.  If the sales price does not equal or exceed 70 percent of the property’s fair market value, the sale can be voided as a fraudulent transfer if the debtor files for bankruptcy within one year of the sale.

 

An action to set aside a sale must be initiated within four years.

 

If the debtor does attack the foreclosure sale under Texas law because of an irregularity, the attack most likely will be for damages and not to rescind.  To set aside the sale, the debtor first must repay or offer to redeem the property from the purchaser at the price brought at the foreclosure sale.  If the debtor was in possession of such resources, the foreclosure probably would not have occurred.

 

It is, therefore, imperative that one seeking to attack foreclosure do so “before” rather than “after” a sale to maximize probability of a good result.

The Dodd-Frank Act Expands the Ability to Pay Higher Whistleblower Awards

One small provision tucked into the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act may have very significant and costly consequences for corporations.  Though it hasn’t received as much public attention and discussion as higher profile provisions of the Act, the Act includes a whistleblower provision that rewards individuals who assist the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in uncovering securities violations, including violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).  Whistleblowers who provide information regarding any type of violation of Federal securities laws that would lead to an SEC enforcement action of greater than a million dollars are entitled to recovery.  For a whistleblower, the payoff is an award of at least 10 percent and up to 30 percent of the fines collected worldwide as a result of violations of FCPA based upon a number of criteria, including the significance of the information provided, the degree of assistance provided, the “programmatic interest” of the SEC in deterring violations of the securities laws by making awards and such additional relevant factors as the SEC may establish by rule or regulation.  Such a remuneration would mean that in cases that result in a $100 million payoff, the whistleblower receives at least $10 million and perhaps as much as $30 million.  There is the potential now for whistleblowers to be enticed by lucrative fees they will receive for providing information to the government. 

 

Excluded from participation in the program is any whistleblower who, at the time the whistleblower acquired the original information submitted to the SEC, was a member, officer, or employee of a specifically indicated regulatory agency, the Department of Justice, a self-regulating organization, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or a law enforcement agency.  Further, a whistleblower is not eligible to be compensated under certain defined circumstances.


The new legislation has broad implications across the financial and corporate sectors and gives increased power and reach to the SEC.  The SEC and the Department of Justice in the past few years have been active in the area of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act matters.  As of the signing of the bill, the SEC has greater ability to extract information from employees of corporations and others involved with those employees.  Congress believes, based on prior enforcement actions, that some of the best evidence and information the SEC can use in enforcement action is from those knowledgeable employees tucked inside a company. 

 

In major accounting fraud cases such as WorldCom and AIG, the total sanctions in those enforcement actions were in the hundreds of millions of dollars.  In cases such as this, the corporate insider whistleblower would have a very large reward at the end of the process.  The types of cases and the potential recoveries involved have actually greatly expended and increased as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act whistleblower provisions.

 

Since there are over 500 public companies and over 1,500 financial sector companies headquartered in Texas, this new movement by the SEC may mean such businesses need to re-evaluate and improve their internal compliance structure to prevent any violations of federal and state securities laws.

 

Whistleblowers are allowed to anonymously provide information through counsel, but must identify themselves prior to receiving any award.

 

It should be noted that this Dodd-Frank Act also creates a private right of action for whistleblowers against employers who discharge, suspend, threaten, harass, or discriminate against a whistleblower, and makes favorable changes regarding whistleblower laws under the Sarbanes Oxley Act Section 1514a, such as extending the limitation period and providing for a jury trial in federal court. 

Filing Whistleblower Complaints Under The Sarbanes – Oxley Act

Employees who work for publicly traded companies or companies that are required to file certain reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are protected from retaliation for reporting alleged violations of mail, wire, bank or securities fraud; violations of rules or regulations of SEC; or federal laws relating to fraud against shareholders.

 

A company is covered by Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 if it has a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act, or is required to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Act.  Its contractors, subcontractors, or agents may also be covered.

 

If an employer is covered under the Act, it may not discharge or in any manner retaliate against an employee because he or she:

 

  • provided information
  • caused information to be provided, or
  • assisted in an investigation by
    1. a federal regulatory or law enforcement agency
    2. a member or committee of Congress, or
    3. an internal investigation by the company relating to an alleged violation of mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, securities fraud, or violating SEC rules or regulations or federal laws relating to fraud against shareholders.

In addition, an employer may not discharge or in any manner retaliate against an employee because he or she filed, caused to be filed, participated in or assisted in a proceeding under one of these laws or regulations.

 

If an employer takes retaliatory action against an employee because he or she engaged in any of these protected activities, the employee can file a complaint with OSHA.

 

Your employer may be found to have violated one of these statutes if your protected activity was a motivating factor in its decision to take an unfavorable personnel action against you, such as:

 

  • Firing or laying off
  • Blacklisting
  • Demoting
  • Denying overtime or promotion
  • Disciplining
  • Denying benefits
  • Failing to hire or rehire
  • Intimidation
  • Reassignment affecting promotion prospects
  • Reducing pay or hours

Complaints must be filed in writing within 90 days after an alleged violation of the Act occurs (that is, when the complainant becomes aware of the retaliatory action) and must include the following information:

 

  • The name, address and phone number(s) of the person filing the complaint, or on whose behalf the complaint is being filed, must be included.
  • The names and addresses of the company(s) and person(s) who are alleged to have violated the Act (who the complaint is being filed against).
  • Sufficient detail to allege the four elements of a prima facie violation:
    • The employee engaged in a protected activity or conduct;
    • The employer or named person knew or suspected, actually or constructively, that the employee engaged in the protected activity;
    • The employee suffered an unfavorable personnel action; and
    • The circumstances were sufficient to raise the inference that the protected activity was a contributing factor in the unfavorable action.

The Environmental Whistleblower

Environmental employees may file a complaint if their employer retaliates against them with unfavorable personnel action because they report environmental violations.  The following is a list of statutes that protect environmental whistleblowers.

The Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) provides protections for individuals who report potential violations of environmental laws relating to asbestos in elementary and secondary schools.

The Clean Air Act (CAA) provides protection for employees who report potential violations regarding air emissions from area, stationary and mobile sources into the air.

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) provides protections for employees who report potential violations regarding clean-up of uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites as well as accidents, spills, and other emergency releases of pollutants and contaminants into the environment.

The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) provides protections for employees who report potential violations regarding discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States.

The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) provides protection for employees who report potential violations regarding all waters actually and potentially designed for drinking use, whether from above ground or underground sources.

The Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) provides protections for employees who report potential violations regarding the disposal of solid and hazardous waste at active and future facilities.

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) provides protections for employees who report potential violations regarding industrial chemicals currently produced or imported into the United States.

If your employer is covered under one of these statutes, it may not discharge or in any manner retaliate against you because you reported potential violations of environmental laws and regulations.  Your employer may not discharge or in any manner retaliate against you because you filed, caused to be filed, participated in or assisted in a proceeding under one of these laws or regulations.

Your employer may be found to have violated one of these statutes if your protected activity was a motivating factor in its decision to take an unfavorable personnel action against you, such as:

•  Firing or laying off
•  Blacklisting
•  Demoting
•  Denying overtime or promotion
•  Disciplining
•  Denying benefits
•  Failing to hire or rehire
•  Intimidation
•  Reassignment affecting promotion prospects
•  Reducing pay or hours

Depending on the statute, complaints must be filed within 30 days under CAA, CERCLA, FWPCA, SDWA, SWDA, TSCA or 90 days for AHERA after the alleged unfavorable personnel action occurs.

NACOL LAW FIRM P.C.

8144 Walnut Hill Lane
Suite 1190
Dallas, Texas 75231
972-690-3333
Office Hours
Monday – Thursday, 8am – 5pm
Friday, 8:30am – 5pm

OUR BLOGS

SEARCH

JOIN OUR NETWORK

Attorney Mark A. Nacol is board certified in Civil Trial Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization

Go to Top