,
The Nacol Law Firm PC
The Nacol Law Firm PC

Archive for the ‘Real Estate Litigation’ Category

Improper Home Foreclosure – Know Your Rights

Monday, August 23rd, 2010

Knowledge of the rules, regulations and laws governing Texas home foreclosures can help homeowners protect their interests from an improper or irregular foreclosure.  Foreclosures may be judicial (ordered by a court following a judgment in a lawsuit) or non-judicial (done without court involvement by auction “on the courthouse steps”).  Most foreclosures are non-judicial.

 

Among other things, a proper foreclosure’s involve three core conditions:

 

1.             real estate lien note executed by the mortgagor (borrower) at closing for the balance of the purchase price;

2.             deed of trust signed by the buyer at closing giving the mortgagee (lender or its successor(s)) a security interest in the property being purchased; and

3.             pertinent Texas statutory and case law. 

 

Generally, a foreclosure is proper if it complies with the procedure outlined in the deed of trust.  Texas law is relevant only where the deed of trust is silent on a mandatory statutory issue or where the deed of trust conflicts with Texas law.

 

To initiate a foreclosure the borrower must, among other things, default on a periodic payment required by the real estate lien note as described in the note and deed of trust.  The lender then has the option of accelerating the collection of the remaining balance of the note.  The entire amount of remaining indebtedness, not just the periodic payment in arrears, may then become immediately due and payable in full.  This is known as the acceleration clause.

 

If the collateral securing the note is the debtor’s residence, the lender may not accelerate the not immediately following default.  Instead, the lender must give the debtor at least a 20-day written notice (unless the deed of trust is on the FNMA form, then 30 days notice of default must be given) to cure the payments in arrears thereby reinstating the Note.  The notice must be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested.  This notice cannot be waived and is required in all instances.

 

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act requires that a borrower be given 30 days to request and obtain verification of the debt.  The lender may give notice of default, accelerate the debt, and even post the property for foreclosure in less time, but the foreclosure sale itself should not be conducted until the 30-day debt verification period has expired and only then with proper statutory notice to the Debtor.  There is also an equivalent state statute (the “Texas Debt Collection Practices Act”) contained in Texas Finance Code Chapter 392.  Failure to provide verification of the debt when the borrower has requested it in writing has serious penalties under both laws.

 

If the debtor does not make the payments in default during the 20 or 30-day period, the lender may accelerate the debt by sending notice of the acceleration to the debtor.

 

If the collateral serves as the debtor’s residence, the lender must give the following notice via certified mail unless they are waived in the deed of trust:

 

1.             A demand notice for the installment in arrears and thereafter affording the debtor an opportunity to remedy the default;

2.             A clear and unequivocal notice of the lender’s intent to accelerate the debt after the debtor has been given a reasonable time to cure the installment in arrears;

3.             A final notice that acceleration has in fact occurred.

 

It has been held proper to combine the first notice concerning the default with the second one involving the intent to accelerate.

 

The trustee is the central character in the foreclosure process.  The trustee has the sole authority to sell the property and to convey title to a Buyer.  The debtor grants this authority to the trustee in the deed of trust.  Texas statutes restrict, to some degree, persons eligible to serve as trustees or substitute trustees.  Dual functions under the security agreement disqualify an individual to serve as a trustee.  Likewise, the person cannot be a debt collector.

 

Lenders may authorize a mortgage servicer to appoint a substitute trustee or trustees to serve under the deed of trust.  The name and street address of the substitute trustee or trustees must be disclosed on the appointments and in the notices timely posted and filed at the courthouse and sent to the debtor.

 

Conditions stated in the deed of trust for the appointment of a substitute trustee must be strictly followed.  Unless the deed of trust provides otherwise, a trustee or trustees need not formally resign before another is appointed.  If the original trustee has posted, filed and sent the required notices, the substitute trustee or trustees should postpone the sale. 

 

The sale may occur only on the first Tuesday of each month occurring 21 days after the new notices have been properly posted, filed and sent.  Generally, the sale is conducted at the courthouse steps.

 

The trustee is the only one who can conduct a valid sale.  However agents of the trustee may sign, post, file and send the notices. 

 

After notice has been posted, filed and sent and the required 21-day period has elapsed, the trustee may proceed with the sale on the first Tuesday of the following month anytime between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., but within three hours after the time designated in the notices. 

 

A mortgage servicer has the same authority as a lender as long as these conditions are met:

 

1.             the lender grants the current mortgage servicer the administrative authority to act on its behalf in the servicing agreement;

2.             all notices, filings and postings preceding the foreclosure sale show that the mortgage servicer represents the mortgagee under the service agreement between the two; and

3.             the notices, postings and filings preceding the foreclosure contain the name and address of the mortgagee or the name and address of the mortgage servicer if the lender has granted the mortgage servicer the authority to service the mortgage.

 

As of May 20, 2009 a new federal statute impacts the possession date of rental property purchased at foreclosure.  If the foreclosure involves a federally related mortgage on a dwelling or residential property, the purchaser must give any bona fide tenant in possession at least 90 days notice to vacate.  The term bona fide tenant is defined as one who acquired the lease at an arms-length transaction where the rent is not substantially less than the fair market value for the area. 

 

Inadequacy of the consideration at a foreclosure sale can be grounds to have the sale set aside under federal bankruptcy laws.  If the sales price does not equal or exceed 70 percent of the property’s fair market value, the sale can be voided as a fraudulent transfer if the debtor files for bankruptcy within one year of the sale.

 

An action to set aside a sale must be initiated within four years.

 

If the debtor does attack the foreclosure sale under Texas law because of an irregularity, the attack most likely will be for damages and not to rescind.  To set aside the sale, the debtor first must repay or offer to redeem the property from the purchaser at the price brought at the foreclosure sale.  If the debtor was in possession of such resources, the foreclosure probably would not have occurred.

 

It is, therefore, imperative that one seeking to attack foreclosure do so “before” rather than “after” a sale to maximize probability of a good result.

Homeowners Beware: Mistaken Foreclosures are Occurring Due to Disorganization in Banks

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010

In the continuing foreclosure crisis, millions of people are losing their homes.  Disorganization within big banks that service mortgages is making a growing problem even worse.  The number of cases is growing wherein the breakdown within the banking system is so absolute that it leads to mistaken and/or premature foreclosures.  Many have lost their homes.  Some homeowners, however, with the assistance of an attorney or housing counselor, have been able to reverse a foreclosure.

 

In the worst case scenario banks actually work at odds within themselves, with one arm of the company foreclosing on the home while the other arm offers assistance to the homeowner.  This problem is occurring even among the servicers participating in the administration’s current $75 billion Home Affordable Modification Program.  Servicers operating under the year-old program are forbidden from auctioning someone’s home while a modification decision is pending.  However, homes are still being foreclosed on and auctioned off anyway.

 

The problem seems to lie in a lack of enforcement, lack of punishment and oversight.  The Treasury Department has failed to penalize the servicer for breaking the program’s rules.  Treasury officials overseeing the program say they’re aware of the problems and have moved to fix them. However, some states are moving forward to protect the homeowners with recent rules that stop the foreclosure process if the homeowner requests a modification.

 

Many homeowners have sought assistance through the courts to reclaim their homes.  At a minimum 50 homeowners have recently filed lawsuits alleging a servicer foreclosed on their home while a loan modification was pending and while they were on a payment plan.

 

Homeowners commonly wait 6 months for a decision on a loan modification request.  The new federal program for encouraging loan modifications includes a 3 month trial period, after which servicers are to decide whether to make the modifications permanent.  Some homeowners are saying they have waited as long as 10 months for an answer only to be turned down resulting in misrepresentation and failure of the modification.

 

Millions of struggling homeowners have inundated banks and other servicers – Bank of America is the biggest, followed by Chase and Wells Fargo Bank – for assistance in an effort to avoid foreclosure proceedings.  Communication breaks down because of the way in which the servicers are structured.  While one division typically deals with loan modifications, another division deals with foreclosures.  Often one division is not communicating with the other division. 

 

Homeowners need to beware of companies that state they work with large banks to avoid foreclosure and of companies charging fees for their assistance.  Many homeowners are entering into the loan modification process only to learn that while the modification is being reviewed their home is being foreclosed on and ultimately losing their home.

 

Under the new federal program, servicers must give borrowers a written denial before foreclosing.  However, the servicer is allowed to push along the foreclosure process and even set a sale date.  This allows the servicer to foreclose more quickly if it is determined that the homeowner doesn’t qualify for a modification.  Ultimately, a homeowner may find that they get a modification offer one day and a foreclosure notice the next. 

 

It is possible to contest a foreclosure under the new federal program.  New rules issued by the Treasury Department say the servicer must first give the homeowner a shot at a modification before beginning the foreclosure process.  If your home is being foreclosed on and you have sought to modify your existing loan, make sure you seek proper legal advice.  The sooner the better and preferably, BEFORE the foreclosure date.

BY ALL MEANS STOP THE FORECLOSURE

Saturday, August 21st, 2010

Given the current state of affairs with regard to lenders, mortgagees, loan servicing agencies, collection agencies and the like with respect to home or business mortgages, it is frequently impossible to determine with whom you are speaking, what authority they have and what remedies they are actually capable of agreeing to in a home or business loan dispute. Indeed, frequently the actual owner of the debt is so lost in cybernetic space on Wall Street that a signature cannot even be produced to consummate a valid foreclosure.

I frequently speak with people whose loans have been overcharged or convoluted under the guise of late payments and fees, penalty interest, attorney’s fees, reinstatement fees and the like when in fact payments are current or the delay in receipt is due to the bookkeeping errors or computer generated nightmares which frequently exist at mortgage companies and/or servicing lenders. Clients are lost in the backlog of understaffed and overworked mortgage companies who simply make entries that are either late, erroneous, unjustified or not representative of the actual payments that have been submitted to them by the borrowers/homeowners.

The lenders then, usually through computer generated directives, retain attorneys and foreclose or simply foreclose through the existing trustees or substitute trustees when, in point of fact, the loan is current or if it is not current, the disputed sums claimed or their timeliness it is not the fault of the borrower.

It is critical that a homeowner in this situation make an immediate effort to get a court order enjoining the foreclosure before the foreclosure occurs. There are a myriad of legal rights, remedies, defenses and claims that are either lost or seriously watered down when asserted after the foreclosure sale occurs. It is far easier to put the dry spaghetti in stacks and separate it as appropriate than to try to unravel the spaghetti once it has been cooked. Lenders who proceed with foreclosure are by deed granted legal title, or title is passed to a third party purchaser by virtue of the loan documents and the foreclosure sale. This makes it more difficult for an attorney to enforce the rights of the borrower given the claims, expense and costs of the third parties, tying your lawyer’s hands to some degree in what he is capable of doing for you to save your home or business property.

A temporary restraining order injunction upon proper affidavit with sufficient facts is in most cases granted allowing a home or business owner to enforce his claims against the lender or mortgage company while retaining title to the property during the litigation process which can take anywhere from thirty days to three years depending on the court, the county and the jurisdiction.

It is not uncommon for the court to order the borrower to pay all payments into the court registry or an escrow fund where a true and honest accounting of what is being paid while the case is pending can be applied to the final judgment of the court. If the borrower/homeowner’s case has merit and the lender is in breach, state law permits the payment of attorney’s fees in addition to the claims for fees which are ordinarily authorized in form loan documents which puts added pressure on the lender/mortgagee to come to the table and settle the matter based on the actual facts of the case. However, these efforts are hampered greatly if the foreclosure has already occurred. Remember also that a lawyer needs, depending on the court and jurisdiction, enough time in advance of the foreclosure sale date to prepare a petition, temporary restraining order, and request for injunctive relief and/or claim for damages as the case may be in order to properly enforce the rights of the client.

Sadly enough, it is not uncommon for the first words of the client to be “They foreclosed on my house and all my payments are current, what are we going to do now?” The regrettable answer is, we are going to have to set aside the foreclosure and reverse all the legal title convoluted actions which have occurred by virtue of the Trustee Sale, in addition to making a legal effort to reinstate the loan. In most cases this is far more expensive to the client in attorney’s fees, time and consternation than simply preventing the sale in the first place by injunction.