July 29th, 2010
One small provision tucked into the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act may have very significant and costly consequences for corporations. Though it hasn’t received as much public attention and discussion as higher profile provisions of the Act, the Act includes a whistleblower provision that rewards individuals who assist the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in uncovering securities violations, including violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Whistleblowers who provide information regarding any type of violation of Federal securities laws that would lead to an SEC enforcement action of greater than a million dollars are entitled to recovery. For a whistleblower, the payoff is an award of at least 10 percent and up to 30 percent of the fines collected worldwide as a result of violations of FCPA based upon a number of criteria, including the significance of the information provided, the degree of assistance provided, the “programmatic interest” of the SEC in deterring violations of the securities laws by making awards and such additional relevant factors as the SEC may establish by rule or regulation. Such a remuneration would mean that in cases that result in a $100 million payoff, the whistleblower receives at least $10 million and perhaps as much as $30 million. There is the potential now for whistleblowers to be enticed by lucrative fees they will receive for providing information to the government.
Excluded from participation in the program is any whistleblower who, at the time the whistleblower acquired the original information submitted to the SEC, was a member, officer, or employee of a specifically indicated regulatory agency, the Department of Justice, a self-regulating organization, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or a law enforcement agency. Further, a whistleblower is not eligible to be compensated under certain defined circumstances.
The new legislation has broad implications across the financial and corporate sectors and gives increased power and reach to the SEC. The SEC and the Department of Justice in the past few years have been active in the area of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act matters. As of the signing of the bill, the SEC has greater ability to extract information from employees of corporations and others involved with those employees. Congress believes, based on prior enforcement actions, that some of the best evidence and information the SEC can use in enforcement action is from those knowledgeable employees tucked inside a company.
In major accounting fraud cases such as WorldCom and AIG, the total sanctions in those enforcement actions were in the hundreds of millions of dollars. In cases such as this, the corporate insider whistleblower would have a very large reward at the end of the process. The types of cases and the potential recoveries involved have actually greatly expended and increased as a result of the Dodd-Frank Act whistleblower provisions.
Since there are over 500 public companies and over 1,500 financial sector companies headquartered in Texas, this new movement by the SEC may mean such businesses need to re-evaluate and improve their internal compliance structure to prevent any violations of federal and state securities laws.
Whistleblowers are allowed to anonymously provide information through counsel, but must identify themselves prior to receiving any award.
It should be noted that this Dodd-Frank Act also creates a private right of action for whistleblowers against employers who discharge, suspend, threaten, harass, or discriminate against a whistleblower, and makes favorable changes regarding whistleblower laws under the Sarbanes Oxley Act Section 1514a, such as extending the limitation period and providing for a jury trial in federal court.
Tags: accounting fraud cases, Consumer Protection Act, dallas whistleblower attorney, Department of Justice, Dodd Frank, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform, FCPA, federal court, federal securities laws, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, fraud cases, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, Sarbanes Oxley Act Section 1514a, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, state securities laws, whistle blower, whistleblower, Whistleblower Awards, whistleblower case, whistleblower provisions, whistleblowers, whistleblowing case
Posted in Whistleblowing | 1 Comment »
July 26th, 2010
Employees who work for publicly traded companies or companies that are required to file certain reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are protected from retaliation for reporting alleged violations of mail, wire, bank or securities fraud; violations of rules or regulations of SEC; or federal laws relating to fraud against shareholders.
A company is covered by Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 if it has a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act, or is required to file reports under Section 15(d) of the Act. Its contractors, subcontractors, or agents may also be covered.
If an employer is covered under the Act, it may not discharge or in any manner retaliate against an employee because he or she:
- provided information
- caused information to be provided, or
- assisted in an investigation by
-
- a federal regulatory or law enforcement agency
- a member or committee of Congress, or
- an internal investigation by the company relating to an alleged violation of mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, securities fraud, or violating SEC rules or regulations or federal laws relating to fraud against shareholders.
In addition, an employer may not discharge or in any manner retaliate against an employee because he or she filed, caused to be filed, participated in or assisted in a proceeding under one of these laws or regulations.
If an employer takes retaliatory action against an employee because he or she engaged in any of these protected activities, the employee can file a complaint with OSHA.
Your employer may be found to have violated one of these statutes if your protected activity was a motivating factor in its decision to take an unfavorable personnel action against you, such as:
- Firing or laying off
- Blacklisting
- Demoting
- Denying overtime or promotion
- Disciplining
- Denying benefits
- Failing to hire or rehire
- Intimidation
- Reassignment affecting promotion prospects
- Reducing pay or hours
Complaints must be filed in writing within 90 days after an alleged violation of the Act occurs (that is, when the complainant becomes aware of the retaliatory action) and must include the following information:
- The name, address and phone number(s) of the person filing the complaint, or on whose behalf the complaint is being filed, must be included.
- The names and addresses of the company(s) and person(s) who are alleged to have violated the Act (who the complaint is being filed against).
- Sufficient detail to allege the four elements of a prima facie violation:
-
- The employee engaged in a protected activity or conduct;
- The employer or named person knew or suspected, actually or constructively, that the employee engaged in the protected activity;
- The employee suffered an unfavorable personnel action; and
- The circumstances were sufficient to raise the inference that the protected activity was a contributing factor in the unfavorable action.
Tags: attorney Mark Nacol, bank fraud, dallas whistleblower, dallas whistleblower attorney, fraud against shareholders, mail fraud, Mark Nacol, OSHA, prima facie, prima facie violation, Sarbanes-Oxley, Sarbanes-Oxley Act, SEC, Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities Exchange Act, securities fraud, violating SEC, violating SEC rules, whistleblower, whistleblower attorney, Whistleblower Complaints, wire fraud
Posted in Whistleblowing | No Comments »
July 23rd, 2010
Environmental employees may file a complaint if their employer retaliates against them with unfavorable personnel action because they report environmental violations. The following is a list of statutes that protect environmental whistleblowers.
The Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) provides protections for individuals who report potential violations of environmental laws relating to asbestos in elementary and secondary schools.
The Clean Air Act (CAA) provides protection for employees who report potential violations regarding air emissions from area, stationary and mobile sources into the air.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) provides protections for employees who report potential violations regarding clean-up of uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites as well as accidents, spills, and other emergency releases of pollutants and contaminants into the environment.
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA) provides protections for employees who report potential violations regarding discharges of pollutants into the waters of the United States.
The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) provides protection for employees who report potential violations regarding all waters actually and potentially designed for drinking use, whether from above ground or underground sources.
The Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA) provides protections for employees who report potential violations regarding the disposal of solid and hazardous waste at active and future facilities.
The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) provides protections for employees who report potential violations regarding industrial chemicals currently produced or imported into the United States.
If your employer is covered under one of these statutes, it may not discharge or in any manner retaliate against you because you reported potential violations of environmental laws and regulations. Your employer may not discharge or in any manner retaliate against you because you filed, caused to be filed, participated in or assisted in a proceeding under one of these laws or regulations.
Your employer may be found to have violated one of these statutes if your protected activity was a motivating factor in its decision to take an unfavorable personnel action against you, such as:
• Firing or laying off
• Blacklisting
• Demoting
• Denying overtime or promotion
• Disciplining
• Denying benefits
• Failing to hire or rehire
• Intimidation
• Reassignment affecting promotion prospects
• Reducing pay or hours
Depending on the statute, complaints must be filed within 30 days under CAA, CERCLA, FWPCA, SDWA, SWDA, TSCA or 90 days for AHERA after the alleged unfavorable personnel action occurs.
Tags: AHERA, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, CAA, CERCLA, Clean Air Act, Compensation and Liability Act, Comprehensive Environmental Response, dallas whistleblower attorney, Environmental Whistleblower, Federal Water Pollution Control Act, FWPCA, hazardous waste, Safe Drinking Water Act, SDWA, Solid Waste Disposal Act, SWDA, Toxic Substances Control Act, TSCA, violations of environmental laws, whistleblower, whistleblower attorney
Posted in Whistleblowing | No Comments »