,
The Nacol Law Firm PC
The Nacol Law Firm PC

Posts Tagged ‘dallas attorney’

Preventive Legal Care - Relatively Simple Things Make Large Differences in Legal Costs

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

A commentary by Dallas Attorney Mark Nacol,
of the Nacol Law Firm PC.

dallas-attorney-mark-nacol-of-the-nacol-law-firm-pcDuring the last 37 years of general practice in a number of civil areas, I have had the opportunity to observe repetitive mistakes and decisions made by clients in regard to whether or not preventive legal care is cost-worthy.

Most prudent people do not think twice about having their teeth cleaned, becoming vaccinated for the flu or other childhood illnesses, going to their doctor if they are dizzy, having speech problems or other symptoms of stroke diagnosed or changing the oil in their automobile.

The average person clearly acknowledges the flu shot is definitely preferable to two weeks in bed.  Basic dental hygiene trumps a root canal every time.  A blood thinner medication is far preferable to paralysis or brain damage, and early detection of cancer or other invasive diseases, may significantly improve prognosis for recovery.

On the other hand, when it comes to the ordinary individual’s legal needs, I have noted throughout the years and continue to note a juvenile and somewhat cavalier attitude.  The result is denial and refusal to consider relatively small fees required to bring preventive legal care into play.

Depending on the size and nature of a man, woman or a couple’s estate, probate planning in the form of wills, durable powers of attorney, medical directives, medical authorizations, medical powers of attorney, testamentary and/or intervivos (living) trusts can avoid future attorney’s fees from 50 to 100 times the amount required for preventive care.  Probate and/or litigation without a will in a large estate, disability, dementia, Alzheimer disease or other medical issues requiring guardianship and/or extraordinary legal procedures vastly exceed the basic costs of preventive care.  The cost of fixing the legal problem after the event is extraordinary versus the simple matter of preventive legal care in the first place.  Fees ranging from $500 to $5,000, depending on the complexity of the estate or matter, at first blush might appear large but may frequently be increased by 2 to 3 zeros in complicated, complex litigation that can last for years.

Marital prenuptial agreements are emotionally delicate, but may be a useful and significant tool to provide creditor protection throughout a marriage and reduce the cost of dissolving a marriage, an unfortunate circumstance, by thousands and thousands of dollars.

A properly prepared and executed contract for the purchase and sale of land or for the purchase and sale of a business when accomplished before the transaction is essential in fixing the rights of the parties, establishing enforceability of their promises and the cost necessary to force compliance with those promises.  Time after time, I find a client who comes into my office and looks at me with dog eyes and says, “Can you help me in this business transaction?  I’ve already signed the contract.”  My response, of course, is “Yes, it is my pleasure.  But, it is going to be far more expensive now than if you had simply prophylactically entered into an enforceable agreement prior to the conduct you allege is fraudulent or the subject of a breach at this time.”

The examples above may be extended into almost every area of the law.  Why in the world would anyone want to market an invention, a well known mark of their business or trade, a manuscript or other written document without first having protected those items through trademarks, patents, copyrights or, at the very least, non-disclosure agreements?  A common complaint echoed throughout the years has been the significant cost of the judicial system and the financial burden of enforcing ones right in the courts of law of the state or federal government.  With a bit of foresight and ingenuity and the help of an ethical, competent attorney, and the willingness to spend a smaller sum of money, many of the problems, disappointments and disenfranchisement’s with the judicial system may be bypassed altogether.

In closing, I am reminded of the classical advertisement by Mr. Goodwrench.  “Pay me now or pay me later.”  Preventative maintenance of the most important legal aspects of your life are as important as preventive maintenance of your car.  Have you priced a new engine versus a can of oil lately?

Fathers Have Rights: Establishing Paternity

Wednesday, September 16th, 2009

Paternity is defined as the quality or state of being a father.  Many issues arise in the face of a father being denied access to his child or wondering if he is truly the child’s father.  Where paternity of a child is in question, a mother or alleged father may ask the court to determine paternity of one or several possible fathers. Most paternity actions involve a child born out of wedlock.  However, paternity actions also occur between married persons where someone other than the husband is the father of the child, or where the husband has fathered a child outside of the marriage.  There is a presumption that a child born to a married woman is the child of the husband.  However, this presumption can be overcome by DNA or other valid evidence. If you are questioning paternity, think about when the child could have been conceived.  Consider when you had relevant or timely intercourse.  Understand that paternity is determined by testing DNA from the father and the mother through the use of genetic fingerprinting.  DNA testing is done by drawing blood or by taking a buccal swab, when cells are wiped from the inside of the mouth with a cotton swab.  These tests can determine the father of a child with up to 99% accuracy.  DNA testing is currently the most advanced and accurate technology to determine parentage.  Generally paternity testing is paid for by the father.If you file a paternity suit, you can request the court order DNA testing.  A court may order the mother, father and the child to submit to testing.  Paternity testing can be done during pregnancy or when the child is as young as one day old. Paternity proceedings can be filed by the alleged father, mother, child or child support division of a state.  A private action for paternity is usually prosecuted to secure child support payments from the father, parenting time with the child, and/or fair rights and privilege allocation. Some men are confident that they are the biological father and wish to maintain a legal relationship with the child whether or not they are the father and thus either initiate paternity actions or consent to the entry of a paternity order.  The paternity order entitles the father to visitation time with the child and creates a legal duty for the father to provide for the support of the child in addition to awarding him rights and privileges regarding the child’s future development.When you consent to the entry of a paternity order, absent fraud, you consent for life.  Most jurisdictions will not allow you to escape the consequences of that order, including the requirement of payment for the support of the child.  If there is a chance that you will resent the child, or wish to break off the relationship with the child or, if you ultimately learn that you are not the child’s biological father, make certain you obtain a DNA test before legally admitting and therefore confirming that you are a child’s father. Custody of a child can either be awarded to the father or the mother in a paternity action depending on the facts.  Child support in a paternity action is generally set according to state law standards unless the parties sign an agreement providing for the payment of child support that is approved by the court. Reasons to establish paternity:  to provide the child with a needed identity; to confirm rights, privileges and duties of a parent; to know the health history of both the mother and father for medical care and treatment of a child; establish financial support for the child; establish health insurance coverage, social security eligibility, inheritance and other benefits; and seek public assistance where qualified.

Debt Recovery Concerns

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

Awarding credit is a fundamental facet of American finance and worldwide business. It helps nascent companies get off the ground by providing vital capital, which in turn allows the economy to grow and business opportunities to be created. There is, however, another side to credit funding. The very nature of an individual or a company creating debt to obtain needed capital creates short and long term problems. While companies hope that their business plan is solid and promising enough to achieve cash flow and growth while allowing for repayment of their debts, the fact is that sometimes credit-driven investments do not create projected returns, making for a potentially unpleasant situation for borrowers and lenders alike. When debtors fail to repay debt as promised, more often than not the creditor will have multiple remedies under state and federal law.

During a prolonged economic recession such as the one we are now experiencing, there is a noted increase in both the frequency and promptness of debt collection. As lending companies are themselves not immune to the current recession, timely recovery of past due sums is becoming an increasingly critical consideration. Following a default, lenders should pursue reimbursement within whatever timeframe is appropriate under then relevant circumstances. Regardless of whether or not your decision comes at an inconvenient time for the indebted party, the fact remains that a lender has rights that permit prompt recovery to effectively carry out their business.

In order to properly ensure that delinquent sums due are eventually received, two useful allies are reputable debt collectors/debt collection agencies and attorneys with experience in credit/debt resolution, bankruptcy, or related areas. The two will often work in collaboration, as legal enforcement may be necessary to bring about prompt settlement. It is recommended that the debt collector you retain be local to the area where your debtor is located, as often times localized nuances of business procedures, federal, state, and city statutes, etc. can limit the effectiveness of collectors based elsewhere who are likely to be less familiar with these statutory obligations. Your attorney should be licensed in the state of the debtor.

Significantly, one must address missed payments promptly, and give careful consideration to elevating your collection efforts by turning to legal and financial professionals. Many of the rules and laws at work in the field of credit lending are highly complex, greatly increasing the possibility of errors without third party assistance. Following default, the longer you wait to take action, the more complicated the collection process can become while lowering the prognosis for successful recovery. While not all delinquent payments are the result of intentional nonpayment, the majority of them are, calling for prompt action to avoid “stale claims.” Generally, if you feel as though legal action is the next necessary step, this is very likely the case.

By Alexander Newgard, Administrative Clerk, The Nacol Law Firm PC

Active Military Duty: How Will It Affect My Relationship With My Child?

Friday, August 21st, 2009

Beginning September 1, 2009, under new Texas legislation the courts have a right to temporarily amend certain existing orders concerning a parent who is ordered to military deployment, military mobilization or temporary military duty.

If a conservator is ordered to military deployment, military mobilization, or temporary military duty that involves moving a substantial distance from the conservator’s residence so as to materially affect the conservator’s ability to exercise the conservator’s rights and duties in relation to his or her child, either conservator may file for an order under subchapter (a) of Section 153.702 of the Texas Family Code.

The Court may then render a temporary order in a proceeding under this subchapter regarding:

1. possession of or access to the child; or
2. child support.

A temporary order of the court under this subchapter may grant rights to and impose duties on a designated person (with certain limitations) regarding the child, except the court may not require the designated person to pay child support.

After a conservator’s military deployment, military mobilization, or temporary military duty is concluded, and the conservator returns to the conservator’s usual residence, the temporary orders under this section terminate and the rights of all affected parties are governed by the terms of any court order that was applicable before the conservator was not ordered to military deployment, military mobilization, or temporary military duty.

Further, if the conservator with the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child is ordered to military deployment, military mobilization, or temporary military duty, the court may order appointment of a designated person to exercise the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child during the military deployment, military mobilization, or temporary military duty in the following order of preference:

1. the conservator who does not have the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child;
2. if appointing the conservator described by Subdivision (1) is not in the child’s best interest, a designated person chosen by the conservator with the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child; or
3. if appointing the conservator described by Subdivision (1) or the person chosen under Subdivision (2) is not in the child’s best interest, another person chosen by the court.

A designated person named in a temporary order rendered under this section has the rights and duties of a nonparent appointed as sole managing conservator under Section 153.371 of the Texas Family Code.

The court may limit or expand the rights of a nonparent named as a designated person in a temporary order rendered under this section as appropriate for the best interest of the child.

If the court appoints the conservator without the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child, the court may award visitation with the child to a designated person chosen by the conservator with the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child.

1. The periods of visitation shall be the same as the visitation to which the conservator without the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child was entitled under the court order in effect immediately before the date the temporary order.
2. The temporary order for visitation must provide that.

a. the designated person under this section has the right to possession of the child for the periods and in the manner in which the conservator without the exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child is entitled under the court order in effect immediately before the date of temporary order.
b. the child’s other conservator and the designated person under this section are subject to the requirements of Section 153.316(a) with the designated person considered for purposes of that section to be the possessory conservator;
c. the designated person under this section has the rights and duties of a nonparent possessory conservator under Section 153.376(a) during the period that the person has possession of the child; and
d. the designated person under this section is subject to any provision in a court order restricting or prohibiting access to the child by any specified individual.

3. The court may limit or expand the rights of a nonparent designated person named in a temporary order under this section as appropriate for the best interest of the child.

If the parent without exclusive right to designate the primary residence of the child is ordered to military deployment, military mobilization, or temporary military duty, the court may award visitation with the child to a designated person chosen by such conservator if the visitation is in the best interest of the child.

The temporary order for visitation must provide that:

1. the designated person under this section has the right to possession of the child for the periods and in the manner in which the conservator described by Subsection (a) would be entitled if not ordered to military deployment, military mobilization, or temporary military duty;
2. the child’s other conservator and the designated person under this section are subject to the requirements of Section 153.316, with the designated person considered for purposes of that section to be the possessory conservator;
3. the designated person under this section has the rights and duties of a nonparent possessory conservator under Section 153.376(a) during the period that the designated person has possession of the child; and
4.the designated person under this section is subject to any provision in a court order restricting or prohibiting access to the child by any specified individual.

The court may limit or expand the rights of a nonparent designated person named in a temporary order under this section as appropriate and as is in the best interest of the child.

Women at Risk: The Hazards of a Bad Relationship

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

Abusive men, and women (physical or mental), are all about control and frequently evolve from abusive homes themselves. Police desire to help abused women, but often even after a complaint has been filed, women will not pursue the charges out of fear. Feeling helpless, they are often terrified, brain-washed and really believe that they have nowhere to go. It is not uncommon for an abuser to be very charismatic and after beating his victim return home the following day with flowers showing great affection to his victim. Unfortunately, the victim tends to believe the transparent words “I’ll never do it again!”

One of the most frustrating things for family and friends outside a battering relationship is trying to understand why the abused person doesn’t just leave. It is important to remember that extreme emotional abuse is always present in domestic violence situations. Violence takes place in many forms, is unpredictable and can happen all of the time or just once in a while. Violence is criminal including physical and sexual assault. It is paramount to remember that physical violence, even among family members, is wrong and against the law.

Some of the reasons partners stay in domestic violence situations are:

1. Economic dependence.
2. Fear of greater physical danger or danger for children.
3. Fear of being hunted down and suffering worse beatings.
4. Survival. Fear that the abuser will kill.
5. Fear of emotional damage to children.
6. Fear of losing custody of children.
7. Lack of alternative housing.
8. Lack of job skills.
9. Social isolation resulting in lack of support from family and friends.
10. Social isolation resulting in lack of information about her alternatives and support systems.
11. Lack of understanding from family and friends, police, ministers.
12. Negative response from community, police, courts, social workers.
13. Fear of involvement in the court process.
14. Fear of the unknown, chronic anxiety, and/or depression.
15. Acceptable violence. Living with constant abuse numbs the victim so that they are unable to recognize that they are involved in a set pattern.
16. Ties to the community. The children would have to leave their school, and family would have to leave friends and neighbors.
17. Ties to home and belongings.
18. Family pressure.
19. Denial.
20. Loyalty.
21. Love. Often an abuser is quite loveable and loyal when he is not being abusive.
22. Shame and humiliation. “I don’t want anyone else to know.”
23. Guilt. They believe the abuse is caused by some inadequacy of their own.
24. Demolished self-esteem.
25. Lack of emotional support.

The following is a bill of rights for women in abusive relationships:

1. I have the right to ask for what I want.
2. I have the right to say no to requests or demands I can’t meet.
3. I have the right to express all of my feelings, positive or negative.
4. I have the right to change my mind.
5. I have the right to make mistakes and not have to be perfect.
6. I have the right to follow my own values and standards.
7. I have the right to say no to anything when I feel I am not ready, it is unsafe or it violates my values.
8. I have the right to determine my own priorities.
9. I have the right not to be responsible for others’ behavior, actions, feelings or problems.
10. I have the right to expect honesty from others.
11. I have the right to be angry at someone I love.
12. I have the right to be uniquely myself.
13. I have the right to feel scared and say “I’m afraid.”
14. I have the right to say “I don’t know.”
15. I have the right not to give excuses or reasons for my behavior.
16. I have the right to make decisions based on my feelings.
17. I have the right to my own needs for personal space and time.
18. I have the right to be playful and frivolous.
19. I have the right to be healthier than those around me.
20. I have the right to make friends.
21. I have the right to change and grow.
22. I have the right to be treated with dignity and respect.
23. I have the right to be happy.

Anyone can be a victim of domestic violence. Although both men and women can be abused, most victims are women. Children in homes where there is domestic violence are more likely to be abused or neglected. Even if the children are not physically harmed, they are likely to have serious emotional and behavioral problems and scars.

Abusers try to control their victim’s lives. When abusers feel a loss of control – like when the abused person leaves them – the abuse may get worse. If you are in an abusive situation, take special precautions when you leave. Develop a safety plan.

BEWARE: Social Networking Sites and the Law

Thursday, June 25th, 2009

Social networking sites originated in the mid-1990’s, but only recently began to expand across the web.  Two of the largest social networking sites are MySpace (with over 118 million members) and Facebook (with over 120 million members). 

 

The concept of social networking is easy enough.  You begin by filling out a profile, then you look for people you know.  When you find someone, you click to add him or her as a friend. Once this is done, you can see who your friends know, who your friends’ friends know, and so on.  Social networking is a wonderful avenue for connecting with persons across the globe, but must be done with caution.  Keep in mind, pictures, comments, and other information placed on your site may be accessed in any number of ways and may upon proper predicate be used against you in litigation. 

 

Family law practitioners can uncover a wealth of information using social networking sites.  Many firms are now making it routine to perform MySpace, Facebook and Match.com searches to see if they can obtain useful information on the opposing party, witnesses, or experts.  Such diligence has paid off in some cases.  In one case in particular, pictures were discovered of a wife’s sexually explicit boasts on her boyfriend’s MySpace page.  The evidence obtained assisted lawyers in securing child custody for the husband.  In another case, an attorney was able to undermine an opposing spouse’s credibility when she confronted him with his MySpace page describing him as “single and looking.”  While yet another case was won because a husband presented himself as “divorced” and gave a long description of the type of woman he wanted to meet.  Information obtained from these sites can be very useful when counsel is trying to provide proof of a spouse’s infidelity.  Therefore, is important to carefully and periodically monitor what you place on your social networking site. 

 

Social network evidence may in most cases also be used in child custody cases.  Pictures of a parent in various compromising situations while a child or children are in the parent’s custody can present a major problem in a custody lawsuit.  Partying, drinking, and negative statements about children used on social networking sites can be offered as evidence in Court.  Parents should use caution when placing pictures and other information on their social networking site.

 

Keep in mind that your employer can access your social networking site.  In one case, a partner in one of Dallas’s larger law firms used MySpace and Facebook to uncover details of a client’s former employee and her plans to circumvent a non-compete agreement.

 

Social networking has also been used in sexual harassment cases.  In Houston, Texas, a plaintiff was portrayed as a modest, innocent “wannabe nun.”  The opposing counsel found a MySpace page that painted a very different picture of a plaintiff, with numerous photos of her in scanty or provocative attire and engaged in suggestive horseplay at bars and with friends. 

 

Evidence obtained from social networking sites has been used in personal injury and in criminal cases.  Attorneys are running cyber checks on jury pools.  Many firms are running cyber searches on new clients, witnesses, opposing parties and experts. 

 

In the ever growing and expanding world of cyberspace, it is becoming increasingly important that you inform your counsel of any and all internet usage, sites and blogs which you have joined or participated in so that they may represent you and be properly prepared.

 

 

Torn Apart: Children and Divorce

Monday, June 8th, 2009

Despite the difficulties faced in a divorce, the children should not be placed in the center of the crossfire.  During the divorce process, and sometimes following the divorce process, it is not uncommon for a parent to become so wrapped up in anger, vengeance or simply being “right” that they forget the effect the whole process is having on the children.  Below are some behaviors to avoid and some suggestions to assist you with improving your communications during the divorce process:

 

1.             Do not use children as messengers between “mom” and “dad.”

 

2.             Do not criticize your former spouse in the presence of your children because children realize they are part “mom” and part “dad.”

 

3.             Resist any temptation to allow your children to act as your caretaker.  Children need to be allowed the freedom to be “children.”  Taking on such responsibility at an early age degrades their self-esteem, feeds anger and hinders a child’s ability to relate to their peers.

 

4.             Encourage your children to see your former spouse frequently.  Promote a good relationship for the benefit of the child.

 

5.             Do not argue with your former spouse in the presence of the children.  No matter what the situation, the child will feel torn between taking “mommy’s” side and “daddy’s” side.

 

6.             At every step during the divorce process, remind yourself that your children’s interests are paramount, even over your own. 

 

7.             If you are the non-primary parent, pay your child support.

 

8.             If you are the primary parent and are not receiving child support, do not tell your children.  This feeds a child’s sense of abandonment and erodes their stability.

 

9.             Remember that the Court’s view child support and child custody as two separate and distinct issues.  Children do not understand whether “mommy” and/or “daddy” paid child support, but they do understand that “mommy” and/or “daddy” wants to see me.

 

10.          If at all possible, do not uproot your children.  When a family is falling apart, a child needs a stable home and school life to buffer the trauma.

 

11.          If you have an addiction problem, whether it be drugs, alcohol or any other affliction, seek help immediately.  Such impairments inhibit your ability to reassure your children and give them the attention they need.

 

12.          If you are having difficulty dealing with issues relating to your former spouse, discuss such issues with mental health professionals and counselors.

 

13.          Reassure your children that they are loved and that they have no fault in the divorce.

 

Though these steps are not all-inclusive, they will assist you in dealing with the complex issues of a divorce and hopefully minimize the impact of the divorce process on the children.

The “Special Needs Child” in Divorce

Monday, May 18th, 2009

Divorce is a difficult time for all family members, but especially for the children.  A child that has a serious illness or difficulty prior to the initiation of a divorce may have such problem accelerate during the divorce process. We call such child the “Special Needs Child”. This child has apparent or diagnosed emotional/medical problems.  

Special Needs children are seriously impacted by the decisions made during a divorce.  It is important for parties to determine how meaningful, regular visitation will be accomplished and which parent will have the right to make major decisions on how to address the child’s emotional and medical needs. During a divorce, most parents have difficulty agreeing on issues, especially issues related to the problems associated with a special needs child. 

1. Child with Emotional Issues: 

Children will always experience some level of negative emotions during the divorce process, even in the best circumstances. When a child has a mental illness or emotional problem, how visitation periods are managed, who has the authority to make a decision on medical treatment and therapy and how such decisions will be followed and enforced in each parent’s household will greatly affect the success or failure of the final decree as it pertains to the child.  It is very important to have an order that is flexible and meets the child’s changing needs, yet remains enforceable should action need to be taken due to a parent’s failure to meet the needs of the child. 

Three of the most reported emotional and behavioral issues involving children are Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Behavioral or Conduct Disorders, Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), and chemical addictions. 

2. Special Medical Needs 

When a child has significant medical health problems or disabilities, parents may have very different opinions on who should be the decision maker regarding doctors, medications and regimens for a particular situation.  This may be compounded by the emotions and breakdown in the marital relationship. The court must help to balance the needs and rights of the parents so that each has a voice in their child’s treatment decisions.  It is also important that the parties, along with the Court, work for a consistent treatment protocol for the best interest of meeting the child’s medical needs. 

The real battleground in custody cases becomes the allocation of rights and duties between the parties. This is exacerbated when the child involved has emotional or medical needs.  Other factors that may compound issues are 1) other children involved and 2) whether they also have special needs.  Major problems occur when there are differing views between the parents on how to best treat the problem, lack of consensus among medical and mental health professionals as to the appropriate protocol for treatment and uncertainty among family courts as to which protocol to “impose” upon the family. 

Courts vary greatly on how each allocates rights and duties, even in joint managing conservatorship situations.  In the event the parties cannot agree on the allocation of rights pertaining to educational and medical decisions, then the focus of a custody case becomes one of which parent can best make decisions that are in the best interest of the child.  

To make a meaningful decision on the care of the child, the court will need evidence of the following: 

  • Which parent is the most involved in the decision marking as pertains to the relevant issue?
  • What are the competing theories of how to best treat the child?
  • Current opinions from the child’s physician and /or therapist.
  • What is the generally accepted treatment for the specific condition?
  • What is the likelihood of each parent following the protocol selected by the court?
  • How successful has the treatment been in the past?
  • What are the attitudes of the parents in relation to considering alternative methods if the current situation doesn’t work?
  • Which parent has shown a proven effort at recognizing the child’s needs and working to address them?  

The selection of a reputable expert in the particular field in which the child is affected is paramount to a true evaluation of the situation. Not all doctors and therapists are created equal, and the expert must be a specialist in working with the child’s specific problem. 

The Nacol Law Firm P.C.
Law office of Attorney Mark Nacol
Serving clients in the Dallas / Fort Worth Metroplex for over 30 years
Tel: 972-690-3333

Home Buyer Beware!

Monday, April 27th, 2009

When a home is built the purchaser normally hires the services of a contractor to do the job efficiently, in a workman like manner, and within a specified time-period. For the first-time home buyer this can be a cumbersome task. It is important that contracts are reviewed carefully.

Many first time home buyers do not realize that some contractors use their own form contracts that mostly protect only the home builder should problems arise. These contracts can severely limit the rights of the purchaser. One such problem is the Mechanic’s Lien which, by law, will attach the buyer’s property to his contractor or potential subcontractor.

For every major contracting job that a contractor, subcontractor or supplier engages in, the law permits, subject to proper guidelines and rules, the filing of a mechanics lien on the property of the homeowner When a contractor hires a subcontractor or supplier, even though that subcontractor or supplier is under agreement with the contractor, under law, if unpaid and properly filed, a subcontractor may also attach a lien to the homeowner’s property in their own right. In some circumstances, despite the fact that the homeowner paid the contractor, should the contractor fail to pay the subcontractor or supplier, the homeowner may still be taken to court for enforcement of the mechanics liens and sale of their home to pay the lien(s).While the excitement of moving into a new home is something the buyer looks forward too, many home buyers are finding that they are moving into a home where the property has already been attached by Mechanics Liens.

There are several ways you can protect your home:
1. Hire a reputable contractor.
2. Ask for a detailed agreement.
3. Have the agreement reviewed and fairly modified by an attorney.
4. Incorporate specific deadlines.
5. Issue separate checks.
6. Comply with retainage law clause to acquire some level of relief if liens are filed.
7. Ask for receipts of payment.
8. Get lien waivers.
9. Make final payments and retainage payments only after physical receipt of all lien waivers.

The Nacol Law Firm PC

Law office of Attorney Mark Nacol
Serving clients in the Dallas – Fort Worth Metroplex area for over 30 years
Tel: 972-690-3333

An Employer’s Perspective

Monday, April 27th, 2009

The best employment law defense counsel takes every aspect of a case into account, but most importantly the impact a lawsuit may have on the reputation and finances of the Company. Employers must be aware of state and federal laws that govern employee hiring, compensation and treatment. Federal and State employment laws concerning wages and overtime are complex and impose significant responsibility on the employer.

Other things an employer should consider are:

  • Anti-discrimination laws
    • sexual discrimination
    • age discrimination
    • disability discrimination
    • race discrimination
  • Hiring practices (contracts)
  • Compensation (wages, bonuses, paid leave, vacation pay, benefits, severance packages)
  • Family and Medical Leave
  • Termination
  • Immigration matters
  • Sexual harassment
  • Intellectual property rights

Employers should also be cognizant of employees that are allowed access to intellectual property information created or developed for the Company by employees in the course of their employment.

There are a number of questions to be addressed by the Employer both at the time of hiring personnel and at regular intervals throughout the course of their employment, such as:

· The scope of the employees duties, and how those are to be documented;

· Their level of seniority;

· Whether their duties involve a requirement that they invent (or contribute to inventions);

· The employee’s propensity to invent;

· The access which the employee has to the employer’s resources (both during and after hours) for their own purposes.

· Proprietary Information Agreements

· Non-competition Agreements, where indicated

On the basis of recent decisions of the Federal Court, only very brave employers are likely to decide that they do not require employment agreements with their senior employees or with those employees privy to confidential or proprietary information.

If you are an employer facing legal issues in any aspect of employment or intellectual property rights, consult Mark A. Nacol of The Nacol Law Firm for guidance.

The Nacol Law Firm PC Law office of Attorney Mark Nacol
Serving clients in the Dallas – Fort Worth Metroplex area for over 30 years
Tel: 972-690-3333